Tuesday, December 21, 2010

The Only Threats Have Come From International Travel, So What Is DHS Doing?

Grandmas do not get frisked outside the USA

I’m an American...still. I live part of the year in the USA but most of the year in Chile. I travel a lot on business, throughout the US when I’m there and throughout Latin America when I’m home. I have to go through airport security between thirty and forty times a year, divided more or less evenly between Latin America and US security procedures. The comparison between the two is interesting. The comparison between the two shows that all the American security theatre is a waste of time and money and a completely useless imposition on American travelers.

Before continuing on, I need to make an important point that is ignored by American mainstream media. The hijacking of 4 airliners on 9/11 was a perfect failure of American intelligence. It was not a failure of airport security, it was an astronomical lack of foresight and communication between different branches of the government. The intelligence agencies knew that there was a plot to hijack airliners and use them as bombs against important American buildings, including the World Trade Center. But the CIA and the FBI never communicated with the FAA in order to change airline crew procedures in the case of hijacking. The airline crews on 9/11 did what they were trained to do. They put up no resistance to the hijackers and gave them control of the airplanes. 9/11 would not have happened if it were not for the ponderous size and culture of secrecy in the US government. If the FBI and CIA had published the Yousef plan of using airliners as bombs, 9/11 would not have, could not have happened. If they had talked to the FAA it could not have happened. Our stupid rules and stupid inter-agency secrecy were used against us.

The crimes of 9/11 were planned by Ramsey Yousef, the planner of the first World Trade Center bombing, in the early 1990s. The CIA and FBI had those plans as early as 1994. They knew that Khalid Sheik Mohammed was associated with Yousef and that he was involved in the planning to hijack airliners and use them as bombs to destroy targets in America. They knew that Osama bin Laden was associated with Khalid Sheik Mohammed. Given that Yousef was involved in the first World Trade Center bombing, it would make sense that the airliner plan was going to target the WTC again. Take a look at Peter Lance’s very complete “Terror Time Line” scroll down to 16 September 1994. Also read James Bamford’s “The Shadow Factory” that shows how totally pathetic the American Intelligence operations were in the run-up to 9/11. Here’s an interview with Bamford in which he details some of the criminally pathetic failings of American intelligence that made 9/11 possible. Security procedures were not the problem. The problem was airline crew procedures and the lack of a stout door on airliners. Given the intelligence that the government had and the money that they spend, those errors are almost unexplainable.

So 9/11 was NOT caused by faulty security procedures, it was caused by perfectly incompetent intelligence, communication and FAA mandated procedures. And since 9/11, every single terrorist threat involving airliners has come from a flight that originated outside the USA. Richard Reed, the shoe bomber, boarded American Airlines flight 63 in Paris with destination in Miami. The underwear bomber boarded Northwest Flight 253 in Amsterdam destined for Detroit. The 2006 liquid bomb plot was planned to board ten airliners in the UK, destined for the USA. The recent toner bomb attempt was an air cargo placed onboard an airliner in Yemen with destination in the USA. None of the incidents of possible airliner terrorism since 9/11 have been attempted on flights that originated in the USA.

So if 9/11 was an intelligence and governmental communications failure, and if all subsequent airline terrorism attempts were initiated outside the USA, why has the DHS spent so much money irritating so many Americans in American airports? Is that same level of scrutiny being applied to travelers that initiate their flights outside the USA? Here I will speak from my own experience. In the last twelve months I have flown internationally out of Lima, Peru - Santiago de Chile - Buenos Aires, Argentina - Santa Cruz, Bolivia - La Paz, Bolivia - Quito, Ecuador - Bogotá, Colombia - San José, Costa Rica - Panama City, Panama - Tegucigalpa, Honduras - Ciudad de México, México and Punta Cana, República Dominicana. I have flown out of many of these airports multiple times.

In the twenty-five or thirty international flights out of these airports I have had to remove my shoes once. That was in Punta Cana, which is a tourist town where 95% of the travelers are American or European tourists. I have been asked to take my computer out of my briefcase twice: once in Punta Cana and another time in Lima, although on many other flights out of Lima, I was not requested to remove my computer. I do not remove my belt with its big buckle in Latin American airports, except in Punta Cana, which is basically an extension of the USA. The buckle almost never sets off the metal detector alarm, but on the three occasions that it has (Santiago and Lima) I was cursorily wanded and waved along. At no time did anyone every touch my body. There are no porno scanners in Latin American airports. At no time except in Punta Cana and Ciudad de México did anyone ever look in any of my carry-ons after they were scanned. A travelers tip: watch very closely what the “security agents” in México do with your carry-ons. Briefcases often have the contents checked in México. If they contain anything small and valuable, that may just magically disappear.

Bottom line, I could have carried anything that I wanted on a plane bound for the USA, and the danger to airliners comes from flights that originate outside the USA. The DHS has tried to coerce Latin American countries to apply tougher screening procedures, but they don’t do it. And why should they? The danger is almost non-existent. It is all theatre and the latinos have decided that don’t have any desire to star in those performances. God bless them.

All the airline terrorism incidents have occurred in flights originating outside the USA and security procedures have hardly changed outside the USA, at least in Latin America. So all that the DHS is doing is to feed a pointless, humiliating bureaucracy that violates everyone's Constitutional rights at the cost of the US traveler and taxpayer. DHS security theatre is a performance that is waiting for the final curtain to come down.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Truth Is Treason

We are blessed to live in interesting times. The most interesting aspect of the multiple crises that we are suffering around the world is the blindness of Americans to the terrible transformation of the USA. Truth has become treason. Please click the link and read the one paragraph entry on Lew Rockwell's blog. Truth Is Treason

And buy at least an ounce of silver this week! Here's where: Apmex

Monday, November 22, 2010

Snatched from the jaws of the mighty Río Puelo

Please scroll down for the update.

click on the photos for bigger images

Our cabin in Llanada Grande in 2004 or 2005. On the banks of the Puelo River.

One of the last decent places in the world where the state has yet to interfere in the lives of free people.

The Puelo has eaten the porch off the front of the cabin

The rest of the structure is teetering and ready to fall the ten feet down onto the rocks and then into the cold water.

Snatched from the jaws of the mighty river, the cabin was disassembled and in this picture is being rebuilt. It is now designed to be dragged by ox teams back from the river in an operation known as a minga.


Here is the finished cabin, now christened: La Salvada

A view of the kitchen

Terry and Mary Kohler Getting Ready To Christen "La Salvada"

Alan Ferrell Christens "La Salvada" (The Saved One)

The asado to celebrate the new cabin

Los Culpables

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Crash JP Morgan, Buy Silver

Read more at GATA

Read about mad Max Keiser's campaign to crash JP Morgan Chase and stop the manipulation of the precious metals markets.

Think about buying an ounce or two of silver this week I have had excellent service buying silver from APMEX

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Friday, September 24, 2010

Arthur Rubenstein plays Edvard Grieg's Piano Concerto in A Minor

Excuse me for putting a music video on this blog that rambles among libertarian political rants, short stories and political videos. I always meant to include more of the arts, so here is my favorite piece of music.

This piece sounded awkward to me the first time I heard it as a child. I much preferred another work by Grieg, the Pier Gynt Suite. I still like the Pier Gynt Suite, but upon repeated listening to Grieg's Piano Concerto I found that the notes that seemed out of place provide the perfect stroke to lead into the next beautiful stanzas. I found that every time I listen, it seems more beautiful, it seems to be truly blessed by God with a beauty that is beyond human creation.

This recording is of the great Arthur Rubenstein, may he rest in the arms of the Lord.

first movement

second movement

third movement

I find it almost painfully beautiful when the piano begins to play in middle of the the second movement.
For an insightful explanation of this piece that is "too emotional" and "too beautiful", listen to Tom Manoff discuss this incredible work of art. on "All Things Considered" from NPR News

Stealth Monetization in the U.S.A.

I found Gonzalo Lira a few months ago and he is now one of my favorite bloggers. His pieces on economics are pure genius, or at least they agree completely with my positions. Those two ideas couldn't be mutually exclusive, could they?

So I am going to publish a teaser of his latest article: Stealth Monetization in the U.S.A., that clearly demonstrates how the Federal Reserve Bank is creating vast amounts of new money and seriously endangering the survival of the dollar. Below the teaser is a link to Gonzalo's blog.

Insofar as money is concerned, governments and central banks should be kept as far away from one another as a pedophile from Dakota Fanning. If ever the twain should meet, very bad things would happen. This is because of the disparate natures of government, on the one hand, and the central bank, on the other.

Governments spend money. They spend money on social programs to keep the people docile and happy, wars to keep up the illusion of safety and security, and—almost as an afterthought—infrastructure. Ordinarily, they get the money for all of these things from taxes and other fees that the government collects.

On the other hand, central banks print money. Most of the world’s economies depend on fiat currency—currency that has value because someone says it has value. The person who says it has value is the central bank. They are the custodians of the currency—they take care that it retains its value.

Tons of people say that a fiat currency is unstable, and doomed to fail, and that we will all rue the day that we accepted that abomination into our lives!—and blah-blah-blah, rant-rant-rant.

For the rest of the article click here

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Can we climb out of this hole and grow the economy?

I am not an economist. I am fortunate to never have studied economics in an American University because most of them force young people through incredibly convoluted exercises to try to prove that the patently absurd is true and provable. I admit that perhaps the University of Chicago offers instruction that may apply to the real world, but none of the Ivy League Schools do. At any rate, I have not been indoctrinated in any school of economic theory, but rather have studied on my own. I am not an economist; I am an enthusiast.

So, why do I have the cheek to publicly share my ideas on this arcane subject, otherwise known as the dismal science? I do so because the people that are being listened to, walls plastered with diplomas from Harvard and PhDs from Yale are giving us directions that will lead us directly off of a cliff. These are the same geniuses that did not see the dotcom bubble coming , nor did they see the real-estate bubble coming . They saw no danger in the explosion of derivatives, nor the fact that the Primary Dealer banks practice accounting fraud on a massive scale and are protected from scrutiny by the Secretary of the Treasury.

. They assured us that by hiring nuclear physicists to write complex logarithms that subprime mortgages could be bundled together into AAA rated bonds that would be rock-solid. One of these eminences, in fact, was still assuring people in 2008 that the original culprits, Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, were still rock solid. Well, maybe not. In fact it now looks like they pose a 5.6 Trillion dollar liability to the American taxpayer.

So, as far as I am concerned the call for enthusuiasts to step back and let the “professionals” work things out sounds pretty stupid. Paul Krugman, Ben Bernake and Alan Greenspan can explain in complicated jargon a lot of gobbledygook but they don’t see the sun in the sky.

With no economics training I was able to predict both the dotcom bubble and the real-estate bubble. I was also able to predict that bailing out the Primary Dealers, and “stimulating” the economy with five or six major regurgitations of printed money would do nothing to get us out of recession and put the economy back on track. The economy is dead and is not going to recover by dumping money out of helicopters. In fact, I will now predict that if we continue along with the plan put forth by Ben Bernanke at the economics summit in Wyoming in August, that the USA will suffer an economic collapse triggered by an attack on Treasury bonds. The effect of forcing an endless river of cheap money into the market will be to erase international confidence in the dollar as a reliable store of wealth. As I write this, the majority of US bonds at auction are being bought directly by the Fed. Japan and China are both looking for a way out of the dollar and Obama and his 535 thieves keep spending money like they had some, but they don’t. It may take a year, maybe two or three, but if we don’t change course our bond market will be attacked and there will be a stampede out of the dollar. John Williams from Shodowstats.com thinks that it will happen in as little as six months . The prescription from both the Democrats in charge and the Republican leadership that is coming in, is to treat the crisis caused by excessive money creation, spending and debt with more money creation, spending and debt. So I’m pretty sure that a collapse is inevitable, but it wouldn’t have to be.

First, before giving my prescription for how to save the economy, let me digress one more time and explain something that confused me for a long time and that is the flations. You’ve got INflation, DEflation and HYPER-INflation. Most economists feel that the end game, if it were to occur would be a hyper-inflationary collapse of the dollar. But the geniuses mentioned above scoff at the idea of hyper-inflation at this point. After all we are in the middle of deflation. Asset values are collapsing, trillions have disappeared, inflation isn't anywhere to be seen. In fact the Fed is doing everything it can to get a little inflation started, so anybody who’s predicting hyperinflation now is just some crazy conspiracy theorist, right? Maybe not.

It seems logical to think that hyper-inflation is just accelerated inflation, you have to ascend through “normal” inflation to get into the destructive feedback loop of hyper-inflation. But lets think about what inflation is: it is when a growing money supply is chasing a stagnant or slower growing supply of goods and services. Things get more expensive as more units of money chase a steady amount of goods and service. (This gets more complicated when you add credit into the mix, so I won’t; this example works well enough). But hyper-inflation does not occur because the money supply is increased. It happens when the supply of goods and services is rapidly and sharply reduced. In these cases (Argentina, Zimbabwe, Weimar Republic), the reason behind the disappearance of goods and services is always the same: a loss of faith in money. When the store owner feels that the money is going to become worthless, he doesn’t want to sell his stock, and if he does he’s going to charge a LOT more than he did yesterday so that he can quickly buy something and not hold onto money.

It is entirely possible to go from deflation directly into hyper-inflation, if something spooks the herd and gets them all going in the same direction, you can have a catastrophe. The Fed and the government have created the conditions for the catastrophe and they are continuing to do the wrong things at higher velocity.

So what can we do to avoid disaster? We can voluntarily accept significant pain RIGHT NOW and reform our government completely in order to create a foundation upon which we can return to strong growth and full employment. There will be pain; that much is guaranteed. If we decide to take it now, we can be prepared and hopefully show solidarity to those who need help to keep themselves fed and warm. After taking the pain required to force all the toxic crap and unpayable debt out of the economy, then we need to recreate the Federal government into a sustainable servant of the People. It can be done and these ideas would work. An analogy to the choice between my program and what is probably going to be done, are the Depressions of 1920-1921 and 1929-1945. What happened in 1920?

“The economic situation in 1920 was grim. By that year unemployment had jumped from 4 percent to nearly 12 percent, and GNP declined 17 percent. No wonder, then, that Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover — falsely characterized as a supporter of laissez-faire economics — urged President Harding to consider an array of interventions to turn the economy around. Hoover was ignored.
Instead of "fiscal stimulus," Harding cut the government's budget nearly in half between 1920 and 1922. The rest of Harding's approach was equally laissez-faire. Tax rates were slashed for all income groups. The national debt was reduced by one-third.” The Depression lasted less than a year and a half. From this article by Tom Woods.

The Great Depression was a very different story because of the way it was handled. Like today, the government frantically tried to stimulate spending and to control prices and to put people to work in pointless projects. The situation got progressively worse and scapegoats were produced. The most important of which being gold money. Roosevelt stole the peoples gold money and started an inflation guaranteed to further impoverish the poor. The Great Depression lasted ten times longer than the Depression of 1920 and it caused immeasurably more suffering. So I suggest that we follow the example of President Harding, rather than the statist demagogues, Roosevelt and Hoover. Let’s cut taxes and spending, force the bad debt out into the open and then rebuild.

So here are the steps:

1.- Cut Federal spending by 40%. This will require: Laying off Federal employees by the busload. Closing the Depts. of Agriculture, Education, Interior, Energy and Labor. Cutting the Defense budget by 50%. In the rest of discretionary spending, each Department must cut costs by 40%. Entitlement Programs will have to: Cut Medicare payments to only include lifesaving care for two years. After that time the program needs to be redesigned. Cut social security payments by 15% and raise the retirement age to 67. The Entitlements have grown way beyond what people paid into the system. They need to be cut to sustainable levels. This is the shock to end the deficit and rebuild international faith in our bonds. This will protect us from an attack on the bond market, as long as it is coordinated with #2.

2.- Force the Fed to raise the Federal Funds rate to 4%. No more Quantitative easing. No more money printing. No more purchases of US Bonds at auction (unless there is no other possibility) With rising interest rates the 40% cut in Federal spending will only be worth 35% as interest payments rise, but our bonds will quickly become more attractive. The Fed will have no need to buy our paper. People will start to save again and capital will begin to be accumulated.

3.- Hire Bill Black and 1000 forensic accountants to investigate the banks and close any that aren’t solvent. As interest rates rise, banks that are fraudulently holding a negative balance sheet will be forced out in the open. They need to be dismantled and their assets sold at auction. If accounting fraud is detected, the administrators need to be prosecuted and sent to prison.

4.- Make it easier for citizens to default on debt. This should be a window of a year or two to let people walk away from their homes, their student loan debt and other debt that keeps the economy from working.

5.- Unilaterally withdraw from all international trade organizations. This is one time when having the world’s largest military will be handy. Other countries may howl, but that’s all they can do.

6.- Erase all existing tariffs, import quotas, restrictions and duties, then impose an across-the-board 12% tariff on all imported goods and services with no exceptions. Remove the possibility that politicians will use trade policy to the advantage of campaign donors.

7.- Throw out the entire, complex US income tax code. Taxes will be paid on all income at the rate of 15%. Every adult will have a $10,000 deductible; every dependent child will have a $5,000 deductible. There will be no other deductions. There will be no capital gains tax. There will be no estate tax.

8.- Rescind the Legal Tender laws to keep the government honest. Allow alternative currencies to compete with the dollar freely. This makes the Fed unnecessary and that leads to the last step.

9.- Close the Federal Reserve System. Without the legal tender laws there is no reason for the Fed to exist.

If we had the courage and vision to follow this plan, in 24 months this country would be working again and our economy would have rebounded. We would once again have the most dynamic economy in the world. That would mean that no one would retaliate against our tariff by anything more than an equal tariff because our market would be too important.
We would end all the pointless wars, close all of our overseas bases and cut the military back to only what is needed to protect America and our territories.

We would end Federal financing of student loans, agribusiness, drug and food regulations and we would work at ending the idea of a government-controlled economy.

The government could not spend money that it didn’t have because of the repeal of the legal tender laws. If they print money, people will simply refuse to accept the government money. A balanced budget amendment can be by-passed, but without a monopoly on money creation, the government cannot spend what it doesn’t have.

This list will not be implemented, not even one part of this will happen. It is too radical, too shocking, but something IS going to happen even more shocking than this list: the collapse of the dollar. So this list may serve for the reconstruction of the country after our collapse.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Victory in Iraq?

Since we invaded Iraq, somewhere between two hundred thousand and a half million Iraqis are dead, over four million are displaced. All the Iraqi Christians are now either dead or are refugees outside of Iraq. Iraq's infrastructure is destroyed and the country continues to live under a military occupation by 56,000 American troops and a like number of American mercenaries. The skies are are still patrolled by American helicopter gunships and aircraft and Iraqis cower in fear when they pass overhead.

And for all that, what has been accomplished politically? Well, the Sunnis, who had been nationalist, Ba'athists are now leaning towards fundamentalist Islamist groups like al Qaeda for protection from the ascendent Shiites.
And the Si'ites are now all aligned with Iran in one way or another. So we have made Iraq more unstable and more dangerous by leading the two groups of Iraqis to the two Islamic fundamentalist adversaries that we face in the world. If you remember, Saddam was not religious, and certainly was anti-Iranian. Things are considerably worse and potentially more dangerous than they were.

No real Republic has been formed. That is American hubris, only possible because of American myopia. The only thing that most Americans really understand or are capable of seeing is America. When Americans look out from our country, they do so with an American filter that makes it very hard for them to distinguish what they are seeing. They see American motivations where those don't exist. A western style Republic in Iraq can not possibly survive. Sooner or later the state mechanism will be usurped permanently by whoever is the current leadership and then there will be a violent pruning of any people or groups that threaten that leadership. What is even harder for Americans to understand is that the Iraqis WANT a strongman to take over. They see security in a strong permanent government. Democracy is NOT an Iraqi ideal, its what Iraqis say to please Americans.

All the honest reporters in Iraq know that this is true. The State Dept knows that this is true and the general staff in the Pentagon know this is true. But they all pretend that the dream of the Project for a New American Century came true and we converted an Arab dictatorship into a Constitutional Republic. The idea is so pathetic as to be funny if so many people hadn't died in the process.

Why is it taking so long to form a government? Because the Iraqis that might be able to become that strongman all know that this may very well be the last opportunity to obtain national leadership by relatively peaceful methods. Whoever runs the Iraqi security apparatus now will have an overwhelming advantage over any adversaries. They will be able to use the Iraqi army and police to eliminate rivals and secure their power.

The only thing that will keep that coalescence of power from happening is the presence of 50,000 American troops. That might be enough deterrent to prevent the sectarian grapple for power. So do we have stay there forever? Is that victory?

How about our soldiers....Why are so many committing suicide and murder when they come home? Why are so many of these poor guys winding up in prison and homeless shelters? How many can honestly say that they think they helped create a better world?

Bottom line - We have won nothing. We have killed hundreds of thousands of people needlessly. We have destroyed irreplaceable cultural icons, we have destroyed the most culturally developed nation in the Mid East and we have the hubris to say that we have won. We have indebted our children by another trillion dollars for what? The world isn't safer, the Iraqis aren't better off. All we did was guarantee 7 years of impressive profits for military contractors.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Call the Politburo, We're in Trouble - Entering the Soviet Era in America

Mark it on your calendar. It seems we've finally entered the Soviet era in America.

You remember the Soviet Union, now almost 20 years in its grave. But who gives it a second thought today? Even in its glory years that "evil empire" was sometimes referred to as "the second superpower." In 1991, after seven decades, it suddenly disintegrated and disappeared, leaving the United States -- the "sole superpower," even the "hyperpower," on planet Earth -- surprised but triumphant.

The USSR had been heading for the exits for quite a while, not that official Washington had a clue. At the moment it happened, Soviet "experts" like Secretary of Defense Robert Gates (then director of the CIA) still expected the Cold War to go on and on. In Washington, eyes were trained on the might of the Soviet military, which the Soviet leadership had never stopped feeding, even as its sclerotic bureaucracy was rotting, its economy (which had ceased to grow in the late 1970s) was tanking, budget deficits were soaring, indebtedness to other countries was growing, and social welfare payments were eating into what funds remained. Not even a vigorous, reformist leader like Mikhail Gorbachev could staunch the rot, especially when, in the late 1980s, the price of Russian oil fell drastically.

Looking back, the most distinctive feature of the last years of the Soviet Union may have been the way it continued to pour money into its military -- and its military adventure in Afghanistan -- when it was already going bankrupt and the society it had built was beginning to collapse around it. In the end, its aging leaders made a devastating miscalculation. They mistook military power for power on this planet. Armed to the teeth and possessing a nuclear force capable of destroying the Earth many times over, the Soviets nonetheless remained the vastly poorer, weaker, and (except when it came to the arms race) far less technologically innovative of the two superpowers.

In December 1979, perhaps taking the bait of the Carter administration whose national security advisor was eager to see the Soviets bloodied by a "Vietnam" of their own, the Red Army invaded Afghanistan to support a weak communist government in Kabul. When resistance in the countryside, led by Islamic fundamentalist guerrillas and backed by the other superpower, only grew, the Soviets sent in more troops, launched major offensives, called in air power, and fought on brutally and futilely for a decade until, in 1989, long after they had been whipped, they withdrew in defeat.

Gorbachev had dubbed Afghanistan "the bleeding wound," and when the wounded Red Army finally limped home, it was to a country that would soon cease to exist. For the Soviet Union, Afghanistan had literally proven "the graveyard of empires." If, at the end, its military remained standing, the empire didn't. (And if you don't already find this description just a tad eerie, given the present moment in the U.S., you should.)

Click here for the rest of this fine article

Tuesday, May 18, 2010


May 14, 2010

NIA Announces Release of 'Meltup'

The National Inflation Association is pleased to announce the release of 'Meltup', a new nearly one-hour documentary about how the U.S. economy is at the beginning stages of a currency crisis that will ultimately lead to hyperinflation.

Meltup features Gerald Celente, Peter Schiff, Ron Paul, Marc Faber, Jim Rogers, Tom Woods, and others. The documentary proves through facts and statistics how hyperinflation in the U.S. is now inevitable and how Americans could soon see the end of entitlement programs they have become dependent on to live and survive.

This is a must watch hour long video from Inflation.us. It is now making the viral rounds, and has already had about a half million views in just four days.
Please forward to your friends and neighbors. Inflationist or deflationist, the facts behind this video are undeniable. It is time for the truth about our economy to break through the propaganda machine.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Third Step Prayer

This is the prayer that I pray every morning. I find that it is only when I can get out of myself and approach real humility that the blessing of God comes upon me. It is only when I can get out of myself and approach real humility that I can be of service to my fellow man.

"God, I offer myself to Thee--to build with me and to do with me as Thou wilt. Relieve me of the bondage of self, that I may better do Thy will. Take away my difficulties, that victory over them may bear witness to those I would help of Thy Power, Thy Love, and Thy Way of life.

May I do Thy will always!"

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution

For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress. Many citizens had no idea that members of Congress could retire with the same pay after only one term, that they didn't pay into Social Security, that they specifically exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed (such as being exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment) while ordinary citizens must live under those laws. The latest is to exempt themselves from the Healthcare Reform that is being considered...in all of its forms. Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. I truly don't care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come.

Have each person contact a minimum of Twenty people on their Address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.

In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.

Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution

"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States."

Sunday, January 17, 2010

La Respuesta del Padre

Se tirita con el frío
Escondida en el cuarto oscuro
Y llora.
Sus labios y dedos azules
Y su aliento blanco vapor

Un calendario fuera de su año y motas de polvo
Y una ventana negra sin cortina,
Sacudida por rafagas de lluvia hacen el cuarto más vacio
Pero una bolsa de lana de oveja se inclina a la pared
Dejado por la mujer que abandonó el cuarto
Y la niña saca puñados de lana
Para hacerse un nido en el piso

Ella trata de acurrucarse entre la lana suelta
Sus pestañas baten como alitas pequeñas
Pero no logra dormir y los recuerdos dolorosos vienen…
Su padre, ebrio, amenazante "¿Qué haces aquí niña?"
Y él la miraba con ojos de vidrio negro
Libres de la chispa de emoción y consciencia
"¿Por qué vienes aquí niña? Nadie te quiere aquí."
Y la pequeña se levantaba y salió derrotada otra vez
Escondiendo sus lágrimas de él que la engendró

Sopla más fuerte el viento norte sobre los techos de Puerto Montt
El viento encuentra las grietas y agujeros
Y se mete silbando en el cuarto viejo
La niña tirita con frío y con miedo
Y llora sacudiendose el pecho, ya desesperada y completamente sola

Antes del alba ella se pone de pie en sus piernas pequeñas
Y saca los pelos de lana pegados a su ropa vieja
Y sale a la calle
No resiste más a la soledad

El viento corre gritando por la calle
Los techos suenan
Cuando chocan las planchas con los balazos de lluvia
Ella camina entumida, cuesta abajo hacia el Puerto
Sus manos y pies le arden con el frío
Y la lluvia le empapa la ropa

Se detiene frente a la entrada de una tienda
Se pone debajo del alero de su techo
Y ella llora otra vez
Su pecho sacude con el llanto
"¿Qué sería de mi?"
Y mira arriba, su cara blanca del frío, empapada de lluvia y lágrimas
"Diosito, ¿no me quieres? Estoy tan solita Señor…."

Y baja la cara,
Derrotada se sienta en el escalón de la entrada de la tienda
Pierde el sentido en las manos y piensa de morirse…
"Por favor Señor, por favor Señor"
Alguién le toca
Ella abre los ojos y levanta la mirada para ver
Dos ojos cafes, llenos de amor
El perro le lame las lágrimas
Y ella abraza el cuerpo caliente del perro vago
Hasta que aclara el cielo